Archives

July 2016

Better Practices on Art Insurance

brokenart3

As a consignor:

1) Best to include a clause holding the consignee responsible for damage or loss should his/her insurance company fail to settle any claim within 45 days.

2) Make sure the consignor is additional insured and loss payee.

3) The Certificate of Insurance should be committed by the issuer and not simply informational.

4) READ THE ENTIRE POLICY or have your attorney do so. Know the exceptions which may, effectually, rob you of insurance should the work(s) be damaged or lost.

5) Know the insurance company you are dealing with as certain ones continuously seek reasons for nonpayment or endless delay.

6) Be sure, in the case of damage or loss, you notify your own insurance company, the consignee, and the consignee’s insurance company on a timely basis.

7) Should coverage not be extended for any reason, be sure to read the fine print as to when legal action may be commenced. DON’T MISS THE DATE.

We are compiling both anecdotal and history of various insurance companies’ responsiveness and willingness to live up to their responsibilities. Please forward any information of interest you may have to us at info@artassure.com.

Art Law Art Market Research0 comments

Improper Practices Part II

brokenart1

Yesterday’s note on practices in the art market brought forth a slew of comments and suggestions for publication. We have vetted and two of them and will convey them on to you here.

1) An invoice, not objected to within 30 days by the recipient is deemed to be accepted and becomes a contractual obligation to pay. Buyers, beware of contested invoices going uncontested for more than thirty days.

2) When shipping valuable items with one’s shipper, do not waive any claims of damage to the works while in the hands of the shipper unless you have obtained, in writing, permission for the waiver from your insurer. Failure to do so is cause for the insurance company to deny coverage on damage and, in fact, cancel the policy.

As the art business has grown, the laws, as mentioned here, have the attention of the authorities and enforcement is severe – a reason the community should consult with competent counsel as to its business practices.

We would appreciate your input to our series as we develop these memorandums for the community’s benefit.

Thank you,

ArtAssure Ltd.

info@artassure.com

Art Law Art Litigation0 comments

Improper Practices

2

Tina Fineberg for The New York Times

ArtAssure Ltd. is assembling a series on common legally dangerous practices prevalent in the art market today for use by art professionals.

 

Recently we have learned of a very odd practice, seemingly oft repeated, in the importation of valuable art objects. Certain art dealers and shippers have been declaring zero value for import purposes on highly valuable art objects. Curiosity caught our attention and a quick look on why revealed two interesting details. First, goods declared at zero are not likely to be inspected by customs or other agencies. Second, a zero declaration eliminates certain incoming fees. We also learned that this is not condoned by the authorities who suspect money laundering. This practice, when discovered, enables an insurance company to deny coverage on the artwork, as well as to cancel the policy.

 

Another practice, recently clarified, that of selling art to New York residents from other states. Dealers are not exempt from collecting and paying over New York State sales tax.

 

Most importantly, one must not pay to or receive funds on sales of art from or to third parties. The sources of funds must always be identifiable by the recipient and payments must go to known parties.

 

As the art business has grown the laws, as mentioned here, have the attention of the authorities and enforcement is severe – a reason the community should consult with competent counsel as to their business practices.

 

We would appreciate your input to our series as we develop these memorandums for the community’s benefit.

Art Law Art Litigation0 comments